OUR BLOG

Catalaxia: a Living Model for Growth

Growth is one of the most overused words in business. Every organisation claims to pursue it, but few pause to ask: what kind of growth are we actually building? Is it linear, forced, short-term —or is it sustainable, adaptive, alive?

At Konectica, we work with a model we call Catalaxia. The name comes from the idea of emergence: complex systems that grow not through top-down control, but through the interplay of many agents creating something larger than themselves. Unlike rigid strategic plans, Catalaxia is a living model. It doesn’t dictate every step; it provides conditions for growth to emerge.

We saw this vividly with a Latin American agri-tech company. Their initial request was familiar: “design a five-year strategic plan.” But when we examined their environment —volatile weather patterns, regulatory shifts, new technologies— we knew that a static plan would be obsolete in months. Instead, we proposed a Catalaxia approach.

The company worked with us to design nodes: strategic domains like innovation, partnerships, market intelligence, and culture. Each node had autonomy to experiment, but was connected to the others through shared principles and rituals of alignment. Growth didn’t come from executing a linear plan; it came from the interactions between nodes, which generated new opportunities the board alone could never have predicted.

Within a year, this structure allowed the company to seize a partnership with a European distributor —an opportunity that hadn’t even existed when we started. The living model had created the conditions for growth to emerge, not just be planned.

This is what Catalaxia represents: moving from strategy as architecture to strategy as ecosystem. Leaders stop asking “what’s the perfect plan?” and start asking “what connections and principles will let growth happen organically?”

👉 The real challenge is not writing the future on paper, but designing systems that are alive enough to evolve with it.

The Design Behind a Strategic Sprint

The term “sprint” has been widely adopted in corporate jargon. Teams talk about strategy sprints, design sprints, innovation sprints. But behind the buzzword, many organisations miss the real point: a sprint is not just a fast workshop; it is a carefully designed experience.

At Konectica, we have seen companies treat sprints as events to generate excitement —a flurry of post-its, a couple of brainstorming sessions, a demo at the end. That’s not a sprint; that’s theatre. A true strategic sprint requires structure, discipline, and design.

We saw this difference clearly in a multinational FMCG company. They had run “sprints” before, which felt more like chaotic hackathons. Energy was high, but outcomes were thin. When they invited us to facilitate, we reframed the entire process.

The sprint began not in the workshop room but weeks earlier. We worked with leadership to frame the challenge sharply: not “improve customer experience” but “reduce customer onboarding time by 40% in six months.” That clarity acted as the north star.

Then came the design of the journey. Each day was carefully planned: divergence when new ideas were needed, convergence when decisions had to be made. Each exercise wasn’t random; it was chosen for its ability to unlock a specific kind of thinking. And every artefact produced during the sprint —maps, canvases, prototypes— was linked directly to the decision-making process of the organisation.

The outcome? In five days, the team moved from abstract frustration to a concrete prototype tested with real customers. More importantly, they didn’t just “generate ideas”; they committed to decisions. The sprint had not been a playground, but a laboratory where strategy was accelerated.

This is the essence of a Konectica sprint: it looks dynamic and creative on the surface, but underneath it is rigorously designed. Speed without design is chaos. Design without speed is inertia. The power is in combining both.

👉 So the question for any leader isn’t “Can we run a sprint?” but: “Are we ready to design a sprint that actually moves the business forward?”

AI as a Cultural Mirror

Artificial Intelligence is often described as a tool, a driver, or an accelerator. But in our work at Konectica, we have found that AI acts as something even more revealing: a mirror of organisational culture.

When companies deploy AI, they don’t just automate processes; they expose the patterns, biases, and blind spots that already exist in their system. AI makes culture visible. And that visibility can be uncomfortable.

We saw this in a multinational manufacturing company that introduced AI to optimise recruitment. On paper, the algorithm was neutral. In practice, it quickly started replicating the company’s implicit biases: prioritising candidates from the same schools and backgrounds that managers had historically preferred. Within weeks, HR realised the AI wasn’t innovating —it was amplifying their existing culture.

The leadership’s first reaction was to blame the technology. But the truth was harsher: the AI had simply held up a mirror. It had reflected their hiring habits with ruthless clarity.

Contrast this with a tech scale-up in Spain that deliberately designed its AI as a cultural checkpoint. Before integrating algorithms into decision-making, they asked: “What do we want our culture to look like in five years? Inclusive? Experimental? Collaborative?” They trained the system not just on past behaviours but on aspirational data that embodied those cultural goals. In this case, the mirror didn’t just reveal; it helped shape a new image.

This is the real opportunity of AI as a cultural mirror: it can expose the DNA of an organisation. If that DNA is toxic, AI will magnify it. If it’s healthy, AI will reinforce it. And if leaders are courageous, AI can even become a lens to redesign the culture they want to build.

👉 So the question is not “What will AI do to our company?” but: “What does our use of AI reveal about who we already are —and who we want to become?”

The Alchemy of Strategy and People

Consulting firms love to speak the language of strategy: market share, operating models, digital transformation. These frameworks are valuable, but they can easily become sterile when disconnected from the reality of people. At Konectica, we believe the real magic —what we like to call alchemy— happens when strategy and people are deliberately blended.

A strategy that looks perfect on slides but is rejected by the workforce is no strategy at all. Conversely, people-centred initiatives without a strategic backbone turn into well-meaning but directionless activities. True transformation requires the fusion of both dimensions.

We saw this vividly in a Latin American energy company that approached us with a clear demand: help them redesign their operating model to handle growth. They had worked with a global firm before, which produced an elegant plan with all the right frameworks. But six months later, almost nothing had changed. Why? Because the plan ignored the invisible rules of the company —the informal networks, the pride of technical teams, the distrust between departments.

When we entered, we didn’t start with a new operating model. We started with conversations. We mapped not only processes but also tensions, motivations, and fears. Then we designed strategic interventions together with the people who would live them. The “alchemy” happened when a new structure wasn’t just imposed, but co-created. The plan was still rigorous, but it had fingerprints from the teams who had to make it work.

Three months later, the company wasn’t just “implementing a new model.” They were owning it. And because people owned it, they improved it, adapted it, and defended it when obstacles appeared. Strategy had come alive.

This is the essence of Konectica’s approach. We are not in the business of producing immaculate decks. We are in the business of designing strategies that breathe, because they are infused with human energy. That’s what we mean by alchemy: turning frameworks into living systems by combining them with the messy, powerful, unpredictable dimension of people.

👉 The question leaders should ask is not “Do we have the right strategy?” but: “Have we created the alchemy between strategy and people that will make this strategy real?”

The Value of Convergence: When Many Ideas Compete for Few Resources

Innovation is often described as the art of generating ideas. But in reality, most companies don’t struggle with too few ideas — they struggle with too many. The real bottleneck is not divergence, it’s convergence.

Convergence is the discipline of choosing. Of saying no to ninety ideas so that one can thrive. Of recognising that resources are finite, and that spreading them too thin turns potential breakthroughs into mediocre results.

AI accelerates divergence — fifty prototypes, a hundred concepts, thousands of variations. But unless leaders master convergence, all this abundance becomes noise. Strategy is not about imagining everything that is possible; it’s about deciding what is worth the bet.

The uncomfortable truth is that innovation dies not from a lack of ideas, but from the inability to converge. And convergence, more than creativity, is what separates companies that transform from those that entertain themselves.

Scroll to top