📌 Agile Amnesia: When Teams Forget Why They Started

🎬 Introduction

Sprint. Review. Retro. Repeat.
Another cycle. Another iteration.
But something’s missing.

In many “agile” teams, a strange kind of collective amnesia sets in.
The ceremonies remain. The tools are used.
But the why behind it all gets buried under velocity charts and Jira tickets.

This is what I call Agile Amnesia:
A silent drift from purpose, disguised as high performance.


🧠 What it looks like

  • Teams focused on delivery, not value
  • Dailies become status updates, not collaboration boosters
  • Retros become rituals, not reflection spaces
  • The product backlog grows, but the vision blurs

They are doing Agile.
But they’ve stopped being agile.


đŸ§© Real case

At a SaaS company, a product team had one of the highest throughput scores in the organization.
But customer satisfaction had dropped 22% over the last quarter.

Why?
They were shipping more features, faster than ever—
But no one had challenged why they were building them.

After interviewing team members, a clear pattern emerged:

“We’re not sure who we’re building for anymore.”
“We just focus on hitting sprint goals.”
“The vision used to excite us. Now it’s just tasks.”

Agile had become a process.
Not a mindset.


🔍 A metaphor: the agile treadmill

Imagine getting on a treadmill to train for a mountain hike.
You walk, you run, you sweat.
But if you never get off the treadmill, you’re just moving without direction.

That’s Agile Amnesia: a team in motion, but going nowhere meaningful.


🧭 Four signals of Agile Amnesia

  1. No one questions the backlog anymore
    The list is taken as gospel, not as hypothesis.
  2. Velocity is celebrated more than impact
    “We closed 28 story points!” But
 did they matter?
  3. Retros lose soul
    If people say “same as last time,” it’s not reflection—it’s fatigue.
  4. Customers vanish from conversations
    If the only mention of the user is during sprint review, disconnection is guaranteed.

đŸ› ïž How to revive the “why”

  1. Reground every sprint in impact
    Start planning with: “What problem are we solving and for whom?”
  2. Bring real stories into the room
    Invite a customer. Read a review. Show a case. Make it human.
  3. Redesign retros as catalysts, not complaints
    Use them to imagine, reconnect, realign—not just fix annoyances.
  4. Kill zombie rituals
    If a ceremony feels dead, stop. Reframe. Reboot. Or delete.

đŸš« What to avoid

  • Obsessing over tools
    Tools are containers. Culture is what fills them.
  • Agile theatre
    Stand-ups and Kanbans look nice. But if there’s no ownership or learning
 it’s just performance.
  • Pretending “done” means “useful”
    Something can be shipped and still be irrelevant.

✹ Final thought

Agile isn’t a checklist.
It’s a constant act of remembering:
Who are we serving?
Why are we building?
What do we want to learn?

A team that forgets its “why” becomes a team efficient at the wrong things.

🧬 Culture Prototype: Stop Designing Culture Like a Mission Statement

đŸȘœ Introduction

Culture isn’t written. It’s built.
And yet, too many organizations try to “define” their culture the way they define a slogan — clean, aspirational, framed on a wall. The problem is that culture isn’t a sentence. It’s a set of microdecisions repeated under pressure.

If you want to influence culture, you don’t start with words.
You start with prototypes.


📉 The Problem

Let’s face it: the classic approach to shaping culture is too slow and too abstract. You gather executives, pick five values, write a manifesto, maybe print some posters.

Meanwhile, people on the ground are navigating real constraints, unspoken rules, and incentives that contradict those values.

Culture doesn’t live in statements.
It lives in behaviors.
Especially the ones we reward, tolerate, or ignore.


🧠 The Culture Prototype Mindset

Think of culture not as something you define — but something you prototype.

A culture prototype is a deliberately designed experience that tests a future behavior, belief, or interaction in a safe, observable environment. It’s a cultural “mock-up” where you make the invisible visible and invite people to react, reshape and refine.

This changes everything.

Instead of launching culture with a town hall, you start by testing it like a product. You explore hypotheses, observe reactions, iterate language and rituals.

You design culture like a living interface — not a brand guide.


🔧 Three Practical Prototypes

  1. The Feedback Currency
    Create a prototype week where every piece of feedback must be given in the form of a “coin” — physical or digital — that carries one insight and one appreciation. Then track the flow: who gives most, who hoards, who exchanges. Culture shows up in the economy of attention.

  2. Failure Narratives Wall
    Design a digital (or physical) wall where team members post not just failures, but the narrative about the failure: how they made sense of it, what changed, what still hurts. You’ll notice who dares to go first, who reframes, who hides. That’s the real psychological safety index — not a survey.

  3. Curiosity Permission Slips
    Run a sprint where everyone is required to use 10% of their time to explore something irrelevant to their role, but deeply interesting. The key is not the content — it’s whether people feel they have permission to do so. Culture is shaped by what people feel they can do without asking.


đŸ§Ș A Real Case

In a European fintech company, leadership wanted to promote a more open and experimental culture. Instead of declaring it, they launched a “Culture Sprint”.

Every week, a new behavior was prototyped:

  • Monday standups began with curiosity challenges.

  • Slack bots celebrated unpolished work.

  • Teams voted on micro-rituals they wanted to test.

By week 4, they didn’t need a new culture statement — they had new habits. Participation rates were over 80%, and managers reported a sharp drop in “silent resistance”.

Culture wasn’t introduced. It was experienced, shaped, owned.


🔭 A Strong Analogy

Designing culture without prototyping is like writing an app description without building the interface.

It might sound good, but the first click breaks the illusion.


đŸš© Pitfalls to Avoid

The biggest risk is theater. Culture prototyping must feel real, not staged.
If participants sense it’s performative, they’ll adapt superficially and withdraw emotionally.

Another trap is over-controlling the prototype. You’re not presenting a finished product — you’re co-designing. Leave room for emergence, even if it’s messy.

And perhaps the most subtle danger: not following up. A prototype without continuity feels like betrayal. Design the next step before launching the first.


🎯 Closing

Culture doesn’t need better definitions.
It needs better experiments.

Culture change starts when we make behavior safe to test, language safe to stretch, and meaning safe to negotiate.

So stop asking what your culture is.
Start asking: what’s your next prototype?

Responsible AI Adoption: Turning Principles into Action

Let’s get real.
By now, most organisations have a slide somewhere that says:
“We use AI responsibly.”
But when you ask what that really means — who decides, how it’s enforced, what gets measured — silence.

Because too often, ethics lives in the policy deck.
💡 Not in the decision-making flow.

If you want your AI strategy to be more than PR, you need to operationalise responsibility.


🧠 What does that look like?

✔ Clear criteria for acceptable and unacceptable use
✔ Decision pathways for when AI-generated output is not used
✔ Accountability frameworks: who owns which part of the risk
✔ Diversity in design and testing teams
✔ Continuous auditing — not just before launch, but post-deployment

👉 Responsible AI isn’t what you say.
It’s what you build — into the system.


đŸš« Common pitfalls:

❌ Delegating “ethics” to legal or compliance teams only
❌ Assuming fairness because “the model says so”
❌ Focusing on technical bias but ignoring organisational ones
❌ Confusing transparency with consent
❌ Measuring success by adoption, not by actual impact

Ethics without feedback loops is just branding.


✅ How to embed real responsibility:

  1. Co-design AI governance with cross-functional teams
  2. Include affected users — early and often
  3. Translate abstract principles into decision-making tools
  4. Make responsible use visible, not just stated
  5. Reward people who raise red flags — not just those who deliver fast

đŸ’„ Final provocation:

What if the most strategic move you could make this year
was not scaling faster —
but scaling more responsibly?

If you believe ethics isn’t a side note but the foundation of smart AI adoption, tag someone who’s building systems that deserve our trust đŸ€âš™ïž.

Beyond Tools: AI as an Operating System for Strategic Thinking

Most organisations still treat AI as a toolkit.
Some new features, a chatbot, a recommendation engine

But the real transformation doesn’t happen at the tool level.
💡 It happens when AI becomes a new infrastructure for thinking.

That’s the leap:
👉 From AI as automation
 to AI as augmentation of judgment, vision and strategy.


🧠 What changes when AI becomes your strategic OS?

  • Decisions become faster and more informed
  • Pattern recognition becomes collective, not just expert-driven
  • Leadership moves from “knowing” to “sensemaking”
  • Teams shift from execution to exploration
  • Strategy evolves continuously, not annually

In short:
AI doesn’t just support the plan — it challenges how the plan is made.


đŸš« What gets in the way?

❌ Siloed adoption of tools with no strategic integration
❌ Metrics focused on productivity, not intelligence
❌ A culture that fears error instead of learning from it
❌ Treating AI as “tech stuff” instead of a core leadership topic
❌ Waiting for perfect data instead of starting with informed experimentation


✅ How to start operating strategically with AI:

  1. Frame AI as a thinking partner — not a saviour or enemy
  2. Make its use visible in strategy conversations
  3. Invest in capability-building across roles, not just technical ones
  4. Design for sensemaking loops — reflection, synthesis, recalibration
  5. Create governance structures that ask: Is this decision better now? For whom?

đŸ’„ Final provocation:

What if AI is not just a toolset

but a new mental model for how we lead, collaborate and learn?

If you’re building a more intelligent organisation — not just a more efficient one — share this with someone redesigning strategy at the cognitive level 🧠🌐.

Scroll to top